Questões de Inglês
19.971 Questões
Questão 53 43738
UEMG 2012The Secrets of Stonehenge
All over the globe are historical mysteries left to us by the ancient world - lost civilizations, abandoned cities, and puzzling monuments. One unexplained mystery that has both inspired and mystified modern man for centuries is Stonehenge, a monument located in the United Kingdom. Though it is one of the best-known artifacts in the world, we have no definitive idea of why it was built and what it was actually used for. Today, however, two new investigations may offer some answers.
The first theory begins with findings being unearthed not at Stonehenge, but at a location nearby. Archeologist Mike Parker Pearson and his colleagues have been studying an area about three kilometers northeast of Stonehenge. Here stands Durrington Walls - a structure similar to Stonehenge but about 20 times larger. In and around Durrington Walls were three circular structures made of wood. Evidence suggests that these wooden circles were holy places, or perhaps the residences of important officials who cared for Durrington. Outside Durrington Walls, Parker Pearson and his colleagues have also recently discovered a village of up to 300 houses which date back more than 4,500 years.
What do the findings at Durrington Walls have to do with Stonehenge? Parker Pearson believes there is a connection between the two places, and he cites his recent studies of the Malagasy culture in Madagascar to help explain his theory. In Malagasy culture, stone is a symbol of hardened bones and death. Wood, in contrast, is associated with life. Using this model, Parker Pearson sees associations between the wooden structures of Durrington and the hard monument of Stonehenge. Durrington, in this new theory, is the domain of the living, while Stonehenge is a place of the dead.
Parker Pearson goes on to explain that the houses near Durrington Walls were probably occupied at certain times of the year when people gathered for the summer and winter solstices (the longest and shortest days of the year) to celebrate certain religious ceremonies. And in fact, large amounts of pottery and animal bones have been found near Durrington, suggesting that this site was used as a place for eating and drinking. In contrast, very little pottery has been found at Stonehenge. In addition, almost no human remains have been found at Durrington, but a number of graves have been uncovered at Stonehenge.
Paths from Stonehenge and Durrington Walls to the nearby River Avon also suggest that the two sites were linked. At certain times of the year, most of the dead would have been carried down the road from Durrington and put in the river. Later, remains of the society's rulers would have been brought down the river, carried up the long avenue, and deposited at Stonehenge.
In Wales, about 400 kilometers west of Stonehenge, archeologists have another theory about why the monument was built and what it was used for. In this region of Wales are the Preseli Mountains, archeologists have traced the origin of Stonehenge's oldest stones (often referred to as "bluestones" because of their appearance when wet) to this site.
One question that has puzzled archeologists for years is why ancient Britons did transport these huge stones - which weighed up to 3,600 kilos - and use them to build Stonehenge? Some archeologists believe that early people saw the Preseli hills, with their giant blue stones, as a holy place. There is also a local belief, which is still common today, that the waters coming from the Preseli Mountains can cure illness. It is possible that the motive for moving these stones the great distance to Salisbury Plain was to create a center for health and healing.
How exactly the stones were transported - without the use of wheels - remains a mystery. However it was done, transporting such enormous stones was a remarkable achievement for the time. Stonehenge was abandoned about 3,500 years ago, and because its creators wrote no texts to explain it, they have left us forever with one of history's great puzzles to solve.
Adapted from Reading Explorer 3 (Heinle 2010), by Nancy Douglas (pp. 77-78)
In “transporting such enormous stones was a remarkable achievement for the time”, the word achievement is the synonym of
Questão 52 43736
UEMG 2012The Secrets of Stonehenge
All over the globe are historical mysteries left to us by the ancient world - lost civilizations, abandoned cities, and puzzling monuments. One unexplained mystery that has both inspired and mystified modern man for centuries is Stonehenge, a monument located in the United Kingdom. Though it is one of the best-known artifacts in the world, we have no definitive idea of why it was built and what it was actually used for. Today, however, two new investigations may offer some answers.
The first theory begins with findings being unearthed not at Stonehenge, but at a location nearby. Archeologist Mike Parker Pearson and his colleagues have been studying an area about three kilometers northeast of Stonehenge. Here stands Durrington Walls - a structure similar to Stonehenge but about 20 times larger. In and around Durrington Walls were three circular structures made of wood. Evidence suggests that these wooden circles were holy places, or perhaps the residences of important officials who cared for Durrington. Outside Durrington Walls, Parker Pearson and his colleagues have also recently discovered a village of up to 300 houses which date back more than 4,500 years.
What do the findings at Durrington Walls have to do with Stonehenge? Parker Pearson believes there is a connection between the two places, and he cites his recent studies of the Malagasy culture in Madagascar to help explain his theory. In Malagasy culture, stone is a symbol of hardened bones and death. Wood, in contrast, is associated with life. Using this model, Parker Pearson sees associations between the wooden structures of Durrington and the hard monument of Stonehenge. Durrington, in this new theory, is the domain of the living, while Stonehenge is a place of the dead.
Parker Pearson goes on to explain that the houses near Durrington Walls were probably occupied at certain times of the year when people gathered for the summer and winter solstices (the longest and shortest days of the year) to celebrate certain religious ceremonies. And in fact, large amounts of pottery and animal bones have been found near Durrington, suggesting that this site was used as a place for eating and drinking. In contrast, very little pottery has been found at Stonehenge. In addition, almost no human remains have been found at Durrington, but a number of graves have been uncovered at Stonehenge.
Paths from Stonehenge and Durrington Walls to the nearby River Avon also suggest that the two sites were linked. At certain times of the year, most of the dead would have been carried down the road from Durrington and put in the river. Later, remains of the society's rulers would have been brought down the river, carried up the long avenue, and deposited at Stonehenge.
In Wales, about 400 kilometers west of Stonehenge, archeologists have another theory about why the monument was built and what it was used for. In this region of Wales are the Preseli Mountains, archeologists have traced the origin of Stonehenge's oldest stones (often referred to as "bluestones" because of their appearance when wet) to this site.
One question that has puzzled archeologists for years is why ancient Britons did transport these huge stones - which weighed up to 3,600 kilos - and use them to build Stonehenge? Some archeologists believe that early people saw the Preseli hills, with their giant blue stones, as a holy place. There is also a local belief, which is still common today, that the waters coming from the Preseli Mountains can cure illness. It is possible that the motive for moving these stones the great distance to Salisbury Plain was to create a center for health and healing.
How exactly the stones were transported - without the use of wheels - remains a mystery. However it was done, transporting such enormous stones was a remarkable achievement for the time. Stonehenge was abandoned about 3,500 years ago, and because its creators wrote no texts to explain it, they have left us forever with one of history's great puzzles to solve.
Adapted from Reading Explorer 3 (Heinle 2010), by Nancy Douglas (pp. 77-78)
Which of the alternatives below is the CORRECT correspondent active voice form for the passive voice of the passage “(…) large amounts of pottery and animal bones have been found near Durrington (…)”?
Questão 51 43734
UEMG 2012The Secrets of Stonehenge
All over the globe are historical mysteries left to us by the ancient world - lost civilizations, abandoned cities, and puzzling monuments. One unexplained mystery that has both inspired and mystified modern man for centuries is Stonehenge, a monument located in the United Kingdom. Though it is one of the best-known artifacts in the world, we have no definitive idea of why it was built and what it was actually used for. Today, however, two new investigations may offer some answers.
The first theory begins with findings being unearthed not at Stonehenge, but at a location nearby. Archeologist Mike Parker Pearson and his colleagues have been studying an area about three kilometers northeast of Stonehenge. Here stands Durrington Walls - a structure similar to Stonehenge but about 20 times larger. In and around Durrington Walls were three circular structures made of wood. Evidence suggests that these wooden circles were holy places, or perhaps the residences of important officials who cared for Durrington. Outside Durrington Walls, Parker Pearson and his colleagues have also recently discovered a village of up to 300 houses which date back more than 4,500 years.
What do the findings at Durrington Walls have to do with Stonehenge? Parker Pearson believes there is a connection between the two places, and he cites his recent studies of the Malagasy culture in Madagascar to help explain his theory. In Malagasy culture, stone is a symbol of hardened bones and death. Wood, in contrast, is associated with life. Using this model, Parker Pearson sees associations between the wooden structures of Durrington and the hard monument of Stonehenge. Durrington, in this new theory, is the domain of the living, while Stonehenge is a place of the dead.
Parker Pearson goes on to explain that the houses near Durrington Walls were probably occupied at certain times of the year when people gathered for the summer and winter solstices (the longest and shortest days of the year) to celebrate certain religious ceremonies. And in fact, large amounts of pottery and animal bones have been found near Durrington, suggesting that this site was used as a place for eating and drinking. In contrast, very little pottery has been found at Stonehenge. In addition, almost no human remains have been found at Durrington, but a number of graves have been uncovered at Stonehenge.
Paths from Stonehenge and Durrington Walls to the nearby River Avon also suggest that the two sites were linked. At certain times of the year, most of the dead would have been carried down the road from Durrington and put in the river. Later, remains of the society's rulers would have been brought down the river, carried up the long avenue, and deposited at Stonehenge.
In Wales, about 400 kilometers west of Stonehenge, archeologists have another theory about why the monument was built and what it was used for. In this region of Wales are the Preseli Mountains, archeologists have traced the origin of Stonehenge's oldest stones (often referred to as "bluestones" because of their appearance when wet) to this site.
One question that has puzzled archeologists for years is why ancient Britons did transport these huge stones - which weighed up to 3,600 kilos - and use them to build Stonehenge? Some archeologists believe that early people saw the Preseli hills, with their giant blue stones, as a holy place. There is also a local belief, which is still common today, that the waters coming from the Preseli Mountains can cure illness. It is possible that the motive for moving these stones the great distance to Salisbury Plain was to create a center for health and healing.
How exactly the stones were transported - without the use of wheels - remains a mystery. However it was done, transporting such enormous stones was a remarkable achievement for the time. Stonehenge was abandoned about 3,500 years ago, and because its creators wrote no texts to explain it, they have left us forever with one of history's great puzzles to solve.
Adapted from Reading Explorer 3 (Heinle 2010), by Nancy Douglas (pp. 77-78)
In the sentence “All over the globe are historical mysteries left to us by the ancient world”, the word us is
Questão 50 43732
UEMG 2012The Secrets of Stonehenge
All over the globe are historical mysteries left to us by the ancient world - lost civilizations, abandoned cities, and puzzling monuments. One unexplained mystery that has both inspired and mystified modern man for centuries is Stonehenge, a monument located in the United Kingdom. Though it is one of the best-known artifacts in the world, we have no definitive idea of why it was built and what it was actually used for. Today, however, two new investigations may offer some answers.
The first theory begins with findings being unearthed not at Stonehenge, but at a location nearby. Archeologist Mike Parker Pearson and his colleagues have been studying an area about three kilometers northeast of Stonehenge. Here stands Durrington Walls - a structure similar to Stonehenge but about 20 times larger. In and around Durrington Walls were three circular structures made of wood. Evidence suggests that these wooden circles were holy places, or perhaps the residences of important officials who cared for Durrington. Outside Durrington Walls, Parker Pearson and his colleagues have also recently discovered a village of up to 300 houses which date back more than 4,500 years.
What do the findings at Durrington Walls have to do with Stonehenge? Parker Pearson believes there is a connection between the two places, and he cites his recent studies of the Malagasy culture in Madagascar to help explain his theory. In Malagasy culture, stone is a symbol of hardened bones and death. Wood, in contrast, is associated with life. Using this model, Parker Pearson sees associations between the wooden structures of Durrington and the hard monument of Stonehenge. Durrington, in this new theory, is the domain of the living, while Stonehenge is a place of the dead.
Parker Pearson goes on to explain that the houses near Durrington Walls were probably occupied at certain times of the year when people gathered for the summer and winter solstices (the longest and shortest days of the year) to celebrate certain religious ceremonies. And in fact, large amounts of pottery and animal bones have been found near Durrington, suggesting that this site was used as a place for eating and drinking. In contrast, very little pottery has been found at Stonehenge. In addition, almost no human remains have been found at Durrington, but a number of graves have been uncovered at Stonehenge.
Paths from Stonehenge and Durrington Walls to the nearby River Avon also suggest that the two sites were linked. At certain times of the year, most of the dead would have been carried down the road from Durrington and put in the river. Later, remains of the society's rulers would have been brought down the river, carried up the long avenue, and deposited at Stonehenge.
In Wales, about 400 kilometers west of Stonehenge, archeologists have another theory about why the monument was built and what it was used for. In this region of Wales are the Preseli Mountains, archeologists have traced the origin of Stonehenge's oldest stones (often referred to as "bluestones" because of their appearance when wet) to this site.
One question that has puzzled archeologists for years is why ancient Britons did transport these huge stones - which weighed up to 3,600 kilos - and use them to build Stonehenge? Some archeologists believe that early people saw the Preseli hills, with their giant blue stones, as a holy place. There is also a local belief, which is still common today, that the waters coming from the Preseli Mountains can cure illness. It is possible that the motive for moving these stones the great distance to Salisbury Plain was to create a center for health and healing.
How exactly the stones were transported - without the use of wheels - remains a mystery. However it was done, transporting such enormous stones was a remarkable achievement for the time. Stonehenge was abandoned about 3,500 years ago, and because its creators wrote no texts to explain it, they have left us forever with one of history's great puzzles to solve.
Adapted from Reading Explorer 3 (Heinle 2010), by Nancy Douglas (pp. 77-78)
In “(…) at certain times of the year when people gathered for the summer and winter solstices (…)”, the word gathered means EXCEPT:
Questão 49 43730
UEMG 2012The Secrets of Stonehenge
All over the globe are historical mysteries left to us by the ancient world - lost civilizations, abandoned cities, and puzzling monuments. One unexplained mystery that has both inspired and mystified modern man for centuries is Stonehenge, a monument located in the United Kingdom. Though it is one of the best-known artifacts in the world, we have no definitive idea of why it was built and what it was actually used for. Today, however, two new investigations may offer some answers.
The first theory begins with findings being unearthed not at Stonehenge, but at a location nearby. Archeologist Mike Parker Pearson and his colleagues have been studying an area about three kilometers northeast of Stonehenge. Here stands Durrington Walls - a structure similar to Stonehenge but about 20 times larger. In and around Durrington Walls were three circular structures made of wood. Evidence suggests that these wooden circles were holy places, or perhaps the residences of important officials who cared for Durrington. Outside Durrington Walls, Parker Pearson and his colleagues have also recently discovered a village of up to 300 houses which date back more than 4,500 years.
What do the findings at Durrington Walls have to do with Stonehenge? Parker Pearson believes there is a connection between the two places, and he cites his recent studies of the Malagasy culture in Madagascar to help explain his theory. In Malagasy culture, stone is a symbol of hardened bones and death. Wood, in contrast, is associated with life. Using this model, Parker Pearson sees associations between the wooden structures of Durrington and the hard monument of Stonehenge. Durrington, in this new theory, is the domain of the living, while Stonehenge is a place of the dead.
Parker Pearson goes on to explain that the houses near Durrington Walls were probably occupied at certain times of the year when people gathered for the summer and winter solstices (the longest and shortest days of the year) to celebrate certain religious ceremonies. And in fact, large amounts of pottery and animal bones have been found near Durrington, suggesting that this site was used as a place for eating and drinking. In contrast, very little pottery has been found at Stonehenge. In addition, almost no human remains have been found at Durrington, but a number of graves have been uncovered at Stonehenge.
Paths from Stonehenge and Durrington Walls to the nearby River Avon also suggest that the two sites were linked. At certain times of the year, most of the dead would have been carried down the road from Durrington and put in the river. Later, remains of the society's rulers would have been brought down the river, carried up the long avenue, and deposited at Stonehenge.
In Wales, about 400 kilometers west of Stonehenge, archeologists have another theory about why the monument was built and what it was used for. In this region of Wales are the Preseli Mountains, archeologists have traced the origin of Stonehenge's oldest stones (often referred to as "bluestones" because of their appearance when wet) to this site.
One question that has puzzled archeologists for years is why ancient Britons did transport these huge stones - which weighed up to 3,600 kilos - and use them to build Stonehenge? Some archeologists believe that early people saw the Preseli hills, with their giant blue stones, as a holy place. There is also a local belief, which is still common today, that the waters coming from the Preseli Mountains can cure illness. It is possible that the motive for moving these stones the great distance to Salisbury Plain was to create a center for health and healing.
How exactly the stones were transported - without the use of wheels - remains a mystery. However it was done, transporting such enormous stones was a remarkable achievement for the time. Stonehenge was abandoned about 3,500 years ago, and because its creators wrote no texts to explain it, they have left us forever with one of history's great puzzles to solve.
Adapted from Reading Explorer 3 (Heinle 2010), by Nancy Douglas (pp. 77-78)
According to Parker Pearson's new evidences, one of the possibilities is that the wooden structures of Durrington Walls could represent
Questão 21 42725
UERJ 2012/2What’s in a name? The trouble with lingo
Remember the campaign in New York for garbage collectors to be called sanitation engineers?
Near the top of the strike’s agenda was the matter of getting the respect due to the people doing
such essential work. Unfortunately, the new euphemistic title clarified nothing about the work
and by now is either simply not heard for what it means, or is used in moments of gentle disdain.
[5] A clearer term may have both generated the respect desired and withstood the test of time.
Clarity and sincerity matter. Terms which mislead, confuse or cause offence can become
a distraction from the real content of public debate. In the search for consensus, since public
understanding is harder to change than terminology, changing the terminology might be a better
place to start. No additional prejudice or emotion should be brought to a debate by the terminology
[10] used in it. Here are two examples.
Genetic Engineering and Genetic Modification
Despite the insistence of biotech scientists that genes of completely different species are no
longer being mixed, the message isn’t being heard. They insist that they are now involved only
in developments which simply hasten the natural processes of selective and cross breeding or
[15] cross pollination. As farmers and horticulturists have been doing exactly this, unquestioned, for
years, they cannot understand public resistance.
The problem may well be the terminology. In this context, the words “scientific” or “genetic” have
been irreparably sullied. If “genetic engineering” has, in the public’s view, become synonymous
with the indiscriminate mixing of genes, and if the softer label “genetically modified” hasn’t been
[20] able to shake off a perception of sinister overtones, these terms might as well be dropped − or
left attached only to experiments in Dr. Frankenstein’s laboratory.
Ideally, a new agricultural term would leave out the word “genetic” altogether: it seems to
frighten the public. Assuming it described science’s benign genetic activities accurately, the term
“productivity breeding” is not a trivial call for a euphemism; besides, it would probably encounter
[25] less public opposition.
So, let’s have new terms for selective cross breeding by scientists who simply speed up the same
process that is carried out in nature.
Clean coal*
If this new term was intended to be clear, it hasn’t worked.
[30] In “Politics and the English Language” (1946), George Orwell wrote that because so much political
speech involves defending the indefensible, it has to consist largely of euphemism. He insisted
that, in politics, these euphemisms are “swindles” and “perversions” left deliberately vague in
order to mislead. Deliberate or not, “clean coal” is one of these. Aside from being a contradiction
in terms, the name is misleading, creating the impression of the existence of a new type of coal. In
[35] fact, it is ordinary coal which has been treated to “eliminate” most of its destructive by-products,
which are then buried. The whole process produces emissions. This, though, isn’t clear when it
is simply labelled “clean coal”. The term just doesn’t seem sincere. It’s a red rag to any green.
It’s not asking too much to expect the term describing these procedures to be more accurate. A
clearer term would be less provocative.
[40] So, what’s in a name? A lot. There’s the possibility of confusion, prejudice, perversions and
swindles. For the sake of fair debate, let’s mean what we say and say what we mean.
SEEARGH MACAULAY www.londongrip.com
The author states that the process of eliminating the destructive by-products of the so-called “clean coal” produces emissions.
The fragment of the text in which the underlined pronoun refers to the statement above is:
06
![[Marketing] Questao Topo - deslogado](https://storage.estuda.com.br/banners/0_6b7ebee90b03af1c560c73bb8bcce34a_banner_deslogado_70_dias.png)