Questões de Inglês
19.971 Questões
Questão 19 109771
UERJ 2015/2The Genre of Autobiography and Autofiction
[1] Derived from three Greek words meaning “self”, “life” and “write”, autobiography is a
style of writing that has been around nearly as long as history has been recorded. Yet,
autobiography was not classified as a genre within itself until the late eighteenth century.
In his book, Inside out, E. Stuart Bates offers a functional definition of autobiography as “a
[5] narrative of the past of a person by the person concerned”. That definition, however, is too
broad for some literary critics. Many, such as Philippe Lejeune, wish to define the genre more
narrowly: “(a) retrospective prose narrative produced by a real person concerning his own
existence, focusing on his individual life, in particular on the development of his personality”.
Despite disagreements concerning how inclusive the category of autobiography should
[10] be, there are characteristics that are common to the majority of autobiographical works.
These features are the grammatical perspective of the work, the identity of the self, selfreflection
and introspection.
Most autobiographies are written from the first person singular perspective. The author, the
narrator and the protagonist must share a common identity for the work to be considered
[15] an autobiography. This common identity could be similar, but is not identical. The self that
the author constructs becomes a character within the story that may not be a completely
factual representation of the author’s actual past self.
In their book The voice within, Roger Porter and H. R. Wolf state that “truth is a highly
subjective matter, and no autobiographer can represent exactly what happened back then,
[20] any more than a historian can definitively describe the real truth of the past”.
Because the author cannot describe events objectively, even the most accurate
autobiographies have fictional elements. The blurring of fiction and truth characteristic
of autobiography has even led to the creation of a subdivision within the genre of
autobiography that deals with fictionalized self-accounts. For this style of writing that
[25] blends characteristics of both fiction and autobiography, Serge Doubrovsky coined the
literary term “autofiction”.
The difference between traditional autobiography and the genre of autofiction is that
autobiographers are attempting to depict their real life, while writers of autofiction are
only basing their work upon real experiences. Writers of autofiction are not expected to be
[30] as historically accurate as possible as autobiographers are. According to Alex Hughes,
authors of autofiction are saying “this is me and this is not me”. This sums up autofiction.
Autofiction draws from the life of the writer with the addition of fictional elements to
make the work more than just a life story.
Autobiography is a popular genre. Writers of memoirs and life stories never lack an
[35] audience. People are interested in the actual lives of others and want to know about
others’ pasts and feelings and desires. Autobiography is a way to organize the story of a
life and reflect on the past in order to better understand the present.
hubpages.com
The genre of autofiction shares some of the features of autobiographies.
One of the important characteristics of autofiction can be summarized as:
Questão 18 109770
UERJ 2015/2The Genre of Autobiography and Autofiction
[1] Derived from three Greek words meaning “self”, “life” and “write”, autobiography is a
style of writing that has been around nearly as long as history has been recorded. Yet,
autobiography was not classified as a genre within itself until the late eighteenth century.
In his book, Inside out, E. Stuart Bates offers a functional definition of autobiography as “a
[5] narrative of the past of a person by the person concerned”. That definition, however, is too
broad for some literary critics. Many, such as Philippe Lejeune, wish to define the genre more
narrowly: “(a) retrospective prose narrative produced by a real person concerning his own
existence, focusing on his individual life, in particular on the development of his personality”.
Despite disagreements concerning how inclusive the category of autobiography should
[10] be, there are characteristics that are common to the majority of autobiographical works.
These features are the grammatical perspective of the work, the identity of the self, selfreflection
and introspection.
Most autobiographies are written from the first person singular perspective. The author, the
narrator and the protagonist must share a common identity for the work to be considered
[15] an autobiography. This common identity could be similar, but is not identical. The self that
the author constructs becomes a character within the story that may not be a completely
factual representation of the author’s actual past self.
In their book The voice within, Roger Porter and H. R. Wolf state that “truth is a highly
subjective matter, and no autobiographer can represent exactly what happened back then,
[20] any more than a historian can definitively describe the real truth of the past”.
Because the author cannot describe events objectively, even the most accurate
autobiographies have fictional elements. The blurring of fiction and truth characteristic
of autobiography has even led to the creation of a subdivision within the genre of
autobiography that deals with fictionalized self-accounts. For this style of writing that
[25] blends characteristics of both fiction and autobiography, Serge Doubrovsky coined the
literary term “autofiction”.
The difference between traditional autobiography and the genre of autofiction is that
autobiographers are attempting to depict their real life, while writers of autofiction are
only basing their work upon real experiences. Writers of autofiction are not expected to be
[30] as historically accurate as possible as autobiographers are. According to Alex Hughes,
authors of autofiction are saying “this is me and this is not me”. This sums up autofiction.
Autofiction draws from the life of the writer with the addition of fictional elements to
make the work more than just a life story.
Autobiography is a popular genre. Writers of memoirs and life stories never lack an
[35] audience. People are interested in the actual lives of others and want to know about
others’ pasts and feelings and desires. Autobiography is a way to organize the story of a
life and reflect on the past in order to better understand the present.
hubpages.com
Before the difference between autofiction and autobiography is presented, an important concept for the understanding of such distinction is introduced in the text.
This concept is the one of:
Questão 17 109768
UERJ 2015/2The Genre of Autobiography and Autofiction
[1] Derived from three Greek words meaning “self”, “life” and “write”, autobiography is a
style of writing that has been around nearly as long as history has been recorded. Yet,
autobiography was not classified as a genre within itself until the late eighteenth century.
In his book, Inside out, E. Stuart Bates offers a functional definition of autobiography as “a
[5] narrative of the past of a person by the person concerned”. That definition, however, is too
broad for some literary critics. Many, such as Philippe Lejeune, wish to define the genre more
narrowly: “(a) retrospective prose narrative produced by a real person concerning his own
existence, focusing on his individual life, in particular on the development of his personality”.
Despite disagreements concerning how inclusive the category of autobiography should
[10] be, there are characteristics that are common to the majority of autobiographical works.
These features are the grammatical perspective of the work, the identity of the self, selfreflection
and introspection.
Most autobiographies are written from the first person singular perspective. The author, the
narrator and the protagonist must share a common identity for the work to be considered
[15] an autobiography. This common identity could be similar, but is not identical. The self that
the author constructs becomes a character within the story that may not be a completely
factual representation of the author’s actual past self.
In their book The voice within, Roger Porter and H. R. Wolf state that “truth is a highly
subjective matter, and no autobiographer can represent exactly what happened back then,
[20] any more than a historian can definitively describe the real truth of the past”.
Because the author cannot describe events objectively, even the most accurate
autobiographies have fictional elements. The blurring of fiction and truth characteristic
of autobiography has even led to the creation of a subdivision within the genre of
autobiography that deals with fictionalized self-accounts. For this style of writing that
[25] blends characteristics of both fiction and autobiography, Serge Doubrovsky coined the
literary term “autofiction”.
The difference between traditional autobiography and the genre of autofiction is that
autobiographers are attempting to depict their real life, while writers of autofiction are
only basing their work upon real experiences. Writers of autofiction are not expected to be
[30] as historically accurate as possible as autobiographers are. According to Alex Hughes,
authors of autofiction are saying “this is me and this is not me”. This sums up autofiction.
Autofiction draws from the life of the writer with the addition of fictional elements to
make the work more than just a life story.
Autobiography is a popular genre. Writers of memoirs and life stories never lack an
[35] audience. People are interested in the actual lives of others and want to know about
others’ pasts and feelings and desires. Autobiography is a way to organize the story of a
life and reflect on the past in order to better understand the present.
hubpages.com
In the second paragraph, the author of the text cites E. Stuart Bates, who defines the term autobiography. Another writer, Philippe Lejeune, criticizes this definition and proposes a new one.
The characteristic present in Lejeune’s definition that justifies his criticism is:
Questão 20 107731
ACAFE Medicina 2015/1Brazil cotton deal perpetuates an unhealthy status quo of subsidies
Published by The Washington Post (The text below has been slightly modified to better suit the exam)
1. When is a victory for the United States not a victory
for the American taxpayer? When it’s an international
agreement like the one the Obama administration has
just reached to settle a long-running dispute with
Brazil over cotton subsidies. The roots of that dispute
lie in this country’s history of showering federal funds
on crop producers, including cotton growers. That
particular business received $32.9 billion from
Washington between 1995 and 2012, according to
the Environmental Working Group, largely through
programs that had the effect of rewarding farmers for
increasing production. The extra supply dampened
prices on the world market, so, in 2002, Brazil
complained to the World Trade Organization, which
ruled that US cotton subsidies were indeed
“trade-distorting” and authorized Brazil to retaliate
against US exports. The United States avoided
sanctions — not by reforming its programs but by
agreeing in 2010 to pay Brazil’s cotton farmers
$147.3 million per year.
2. In short, the US government bought off Brazil’s
cotton farmers so that it could keep on buying off its
own. Under the new settlement, announced
Wednesday, Brazil agreed to drop its case at the
WTO and to forgo any new ones during the five-year
term of the farm bill Congress enacted last year. In
return, the United States agreed to trim the modest
US cotton export credit subsidy program and, most
important, to pay Brazil one last dollop of taxpayer
cash, in the amount of $300 million.
3. This is good news to the extent that it fortifies
US-Brazil relations on the eve of a new presidential
term in that country and that it spares US exporters
from the threat of Brazilian retaliation, which could
have reached a total of $829 million per year. Yet, in
essence, the new deal perpetuates the unhealthy
status quo whereby the United States pays Brazil
____ the right ____ continue propping _____ a
domestic cotton industry that can ____ should learn
to compete ____ its own.
What does buy off mean as used in the text?
Questão 19 107730
ACAFE Medicina 2015/1Brazil cotton deal perpetuates an unhealthy status quo of subsidies
Published by The Washington Post (The text below has been slightly modified to better suit the exam)
1. When is a victory for the United States not a victory
for the American taxpayer? When it’s an international
agreement like the one the Obama administration has
just reached to settle a long-running dispute with
Brazil over cotton subsidies. The roots of that dispute
lie in this country’s history of showering federal funds
on crop producers, including cotton growers. That
particular business received $32.9 billion from
Washington between 1995 and 2012, according to
the Environmental Working Group, largely through
programs that had the effect of rewarding farmers for
increasing production. The extra supply dampened
prices on the world market, so, in 2002, Brazil
complained to the World Trade Organization, which
ruled that US cotton subsidies were indeed
“trade-distorting” and authorized Brazil to retaliate
against US exports. The United States avoided
sanctions — not by reforming its programs but by
agreeing in 2010 to pay Brazil’s cotton farmers
$147.3 million per year.
2. In short, the US government bought off Brazil’s
cotton farmers so that it could keep on buying off its
own. Under the new settlement, announced
Wednesday, Brazil agreed to drop its case at the
WTO and to forgo any new ones during the five-year
term of the farm bill Congress enacted last year. In
return, the United States agreed to trim the modest
US cotton export credit subsidy program and, most
important, to pay Brazil one last dollop of taxpayer
cash, in the amount of $300 million.
3. This is good news to the extent that it fortifies
US-Brazil relations on the eve of a new presidential
term in that country and that it spares US exporters
from the threat of Brazilian retaliation, which could
have reached a total of $829 million per year. Yet, in
essence, the new deal perpetuates the unhealthy
status quo whereby the United States pays Brazil
____ the right ____ continue propping _____ a
domestic cotton industry that can ____ should learn
to compete ____ its own.
Which is the correct sequence of the five words missing in the third paragraph?
Questão 18 107729
ACAFE Medicina 2015/1Brazil cotton deal perpetuates an unhealthy status quo of subsidies
Published by The Washington Post (The text below has been slightly modified to better suit the exam)
1. When is a victory for the United States not a victory
for the American taxpayer? When it’s an international
agreement like the one the Obama administration has
just reached to settle a long-running dispute with
Brazil over cotton subsidies. The roots of that dispute
lie in this country’s history of showering federal funds
on crop producers, including cotton growers. That
particular business received $32.9 billion from
Washington between 1995 and 2012, according to
the Environmental Working Group, largely through
programs that had the effect of rewarding farmers for
increasing production. The extra supply dampened
prices on the world market, so, in 2002, Brazil
complained to the World Trade Organization, which
ruled that US cotton subsidies were indeed
“trade-distorting” and authorized Brazil to retaliate
against US exports. The United States avoided
sanctions — not by reforming its programs but by
agreeing in 2010 to pay Brazil’s cotton farmers
$147.3 million per year.
2. In short, the US government bought off Brazil’s
cotton farmers so that it could keep on buying off its
own. Under the new settlement, announced
Wednesday, Brazil agreed to drop its case at the
WTO and to forgo any new ones during the five-year
term of the farm bill Congress enacted last year. In
return, the United States agreed to trim the modest
US cotton export credit subsidy program and, most
important, to pay Brazil one last dollop of taxpayer
cash, in the amount of $300 million.
3. This is good news to the extent that it fortifies
US-Brazil relations on the eve of a new presidential
term in that country and that it spares US exporters
from the threat of Brazilian retaliation, which could
have reached a total of $829 million per year. Yet, in
essence, the new deal perpetuates the unhealthy
status quo whereby the United States pays Brazil
____ the right ____ continue propping _____ a
domestic cotton industry that can ____ should learn
to compete ____ its own.
Who did not benefit from the settlement reached between the US and Brazil, according to the text?
06
![[Marketing] Questao Topo - deslogado](https://storage.estuda.com.br/banners/0_6b7ebee90b03af1c560c73bb8bcce34a_banner_deslogado_70_dias.png)